Allow Greater Flexibility in No. of Teams to Be Bought

12 votes

Voting disabled

Sometimes 20 is too few and 50 too many, so it would be great to be able to offer e.g. 25, 30, and 40 as well.

Out of Scope 1.0 2.0 Design Optimization Suggested by: Pernille Flensted-Jensen (15 Feb, '23) • Upvoted: 31 Jul, '24 • Comments: 3

Comments: 3
Oldest • Newest • Most likes • Fewest likes

20 May, '24
Michelle Arentz
Highlighted comment

OMG, yes! I was horrified to realize we are now stuck with only the "up to 50" option as the entry point. Please bring back the "per team" options! More than 90% of companies in the US have fewer than 20 people on staff - this cuts out a TON of possibilities to help more companies do a better job of helping employees succeed (isn't the PI mantra "better work/better world"?!
17 Jun, '24
Robyn Knox
I agree with Michelle! I have a potential new client with less than 20 employees. Their budget is small, so I can't justify the current price for Design since they will only build one team. It would be great if a small company could purchase just one team (or keep the one team that we use to demo the power of the software using the TSS).
12 Feb, '25
Joe Kirschbaum Admin
We have moved away from Teams based pricing in PI2. Moving forward in PI2 pricing will be based on headcount